Hello Readers,
This blog post is one of my academic activities based on Derrida's Deconstruction.
Here i am sharing my views on What is Deconstruction.
First of all Derrida ask some questions that, Is it possible to define something.? What are the limits or to what extent can we define something.? Derrida is difficult Philosopher to read and his term "Deconstruction" is even more difficult to understand. Deconstruction is not distractive activity but an inquiry in to the foundation.
Structuralist critic refer every text or every work by its meaning but post-structuralist can not see the texts or work by its meaning. They believe that every person's thoughts are different so and their thinking is also different , For example I read one book and same book was also read by someone else so according to me the meaning is different but according to others the meaning is different from mine so its called free play of meaning. Means the word is only word we give them different meanings. For example there is word 'Discipline', this word is only word but we gave its meaning there is different meaning of this word like discipline means branch of knowledge or the other meaning is someones good or bad behavior. What connects a word with its meaning or as single with its meaning is the convention and the convention is always social. Derrida points out that the meaning of the word is nothing but the other word. Meaning of one word is set of another words. One word leads to another word and that word leads to yet another...and finally we never come out of the dictionary. We can not find a particular meaning of any word. Its nothing but our illusion that we know the meaning of the word. So the meaning is always postponed. And finally we can say that the meaning is nothing but an illusion.
This blog post is one of my academic activities based on Derrida's Deconstruction.
Here i am sharing my views on What is Deconstruction.
First of all Derrida ask some questions that, Is it possible to define something.? What are the limits or to what extent can we define something.? Derrida is difficult Philosopher to read and his term "Deconstruction" is even more difficult to understand. Deconstruction is not distractive activity but an inquiry in to the foundation.
Structuralist critic refer every text or every work by its meaning but post-structuralist can not see the texts or work by its meaning. They believe that every person's thoughts are different so and their thinking is also different , For example I read one book and same book was also read by someone else so according to me the meaning is different but according to others the meaning is different from mine so its called free play of meaning. Means the word is only word we give them different meanings. For example there is word 'Discipline', this word is only word but we gave its meaning there is different meaning of this word like discipline means branch of knowledge or the other meaning is someones good or bad behavior. What connects a word with its meaning or as single with its meaning is the convention and the convention is always social. Derrida points out that the meaning of the word is nothing but the other word. Meaning of one word is set of another words. One word leads to another word and that word leads to yet another...and finally we never come out of the dictionary. We can not find a particular meaning of any word. Its nothing but our illusion that we know the meaning of the word. So the meaning is always postponed. And finally we can say that the meaning is nothing but an illusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment